To Roth or Not to Roth with Social(k)

To Roth or not to Roth

Many people are familiar with a Roth IRA. Put money away, after taxes are paid on those earnings, let the money grow tax differed in the IRA, then take tax-free distributions of the earnings.

Not a bad deal, lets go through it again.

Earn $40,000.

Pay taxes on all $40,000.

Put $5000 into Roth IRA, after tax.

$5000 grows to $75,000 over your lifetime.

Take original $5000 out – taxes were paid when that money was earned. Take $70,000 tax-free. Nothing due on earnings.

In a regular IRA you put $5000, before taxes, from earnings into same investments in IRA, grows to same $75,000 over time. Then pay taxes on all $75,000 when taking it out of IRA.

Pay taxes now on $5,000 and nothing later,

$70,000 distribution – tax-free.

Or,

Pay no taxes now on $5000 and pay taxes on full $75,000 taxable distribution.

Seems fairly straight forward, especially if you think taxes will be the same or possibly higher when you retire.

Here is where it gets interesting.

A Roth IRA has earnings limitations. If you earn over $120,000 as a

single person, or over $177,000 as a married person, you can not make a Roth contribution. Tough luck.

But wait……..

Making an employee contribution into a Roth ‘bucket’ in your 401(k) has no earnings limitation. You can put full employee contribution into the Roth ‘bucket’ not just $5,000.

If you earn $200,000, are over age 50, you can put $22,000 into the Roth 401(k) at work.

In 25 years that $22,000, earning 6% grows to $94421.16. The $22,000 had taxes paid when earned, but the growth $72,421.16 is never subject to taxes.

I’d call that the best kept secret out there.

This is an example and anyone interested in further information should contact a registered financial advisor, or ask about a Social(k) 401(k) /  403(b) at work.

GreenMoney Journal Interview: Portfolio 21

Portfolio 21: We have been managing investments with social and environmental screens for 27 years. As SRI grew dramatically during the 1980s and 1990s it became increasingly clear that investor priorities were focusing more on environmental issues. The launch of the Portfolio 21 fund in 1999 was inspired by The Natural Step (http://www.naturalstep.org ), which we integrated into every aspect of our company and culture during the late 1990s. Paul Hawken was instrumental in bringing The Natural Step from Sweden to the U.S. and he continues to be a great inspiration to Portfolio 21.

Through The Natural Step process we began studying environmental sustainability as it relates to the investment process and decided to design an investment strategy for managing ecological risks and opportunities. We were one of the first to develop investment selection criteria to identify companies with a higher probability for adaptation in a resource-constrained world.

via GreenMoney Journal.

Draw the line at investing in genocide

“Ethical investing” may mean different things to different people, but surely there is a minimum standard upon which nearly all of us agree. We do not want our family savings and pension funds invested in companies that help to fund genocide.

The goal of Investors Against Genocide is to convince financial institutions to make a commitment that they will not invest in genocide. Help us send a strong message to these companies to draw the line at genocide.

The investment landscape has changed dramatically in the last year. Following action by American Funds and TIAA-CREF, investors, who are concerned about their savings being connected to genocide, now have clear, mainstream choices. The positive actions by American Funds and TIAA-CREF stand in stark contrast to Vanguard, Fidelity, and Franklin Templeton for taking no action and continuing to hold large investments in companies, such as PetroChina, linked to an ongoing genocide.

* TIAA-CREF made a commitment to genocide-free investing! Read more here about news from March 2009 and January 2010.

* American Funds applied its human rights policy and divested PetroChina! Read more here about news from February 2010.

via Draw the line at investing in genocide.

TIAA-CREF Announcing Escalated Effort to Oppose Genocide in Darfur

Today TIAA-CREF announces a new escalated phase in our continuing campaign to pressure portfolio companies that maintain business relations with the Sudanese government to cease those relations or attempt to end genocide and ease suffering in Darfur. We plan to intensify pressure on such companies and divest from those that fail to take meaningful steps to respect human rights within a reasonable time.

TIAA-CREF believes that members of society have a moral responsibility to confront genocide and crimes against humanity. Therefore we are publicly asking companies operating in Sudan to help alleviate the suffering of its people. With that in mind, TIAA-CREF will:

* Seek meetings between TIAA-CREF executives and executives of target companies to encourage them to take positive and meaningful humanitarian steps and attempt to end genocide;

* Publicly endorse the U.N.-sponsored Principles for Responsible Investment. Signatories include institutional investors with a combined $2.5 trillion in assets under management with whom we will join to urge companies operating in Sudan to confront human rights abuses; and

* Call upon other financial services companies to follow our lead and increase pressure on target companies.

via TIAA-CREF – Statement by TIAA-CREF Announcing Escalated Effort to Oppose Genocide in Darfur.

Why you need to know how your funds vote your shares.

What would happen if all the small investors banded together and cast their ballots during proxy season, the time of year when all shareholders get to vote on corporate issues? How much of an impact would they have?

via Your Money – Small Shareholders May Get a Say With New Rules and Methods – NYTimes.com.

ProxyDemocracy | For mutual fund owners

When you own shares in a mutual fund (as about half of Americans do), you take a stand on issues like executive compensation, labor standards, and global warming. That's because your mutual fund votes on these issues at shareholder meetings of the companies in which it invests.

via ProxyDemocracy | For mutual fund owners.